Working with what you’ve got – The Fokus.se story

Good Old Trend

At the end of last week we released the second part of our web project for the news magazine Fokus. It’s a wiki with the 100 most powerful people in Sweden, to begin with. Also, we built in Twingly functionality which aggregates what bloggers say about each person.

Working with a small, but strong, brand like Fokus requires careful planning. Below I’ll share some thoughts on how we reasoned in choosing these specific projects.

1. First things first: get up to speed. Before we could do anything interesting or exotic we had to make sure that Fokus regular website was okay. Our hypotheses was that a lot of bloggers read the magazine and would have blogged about the articles – if only they weere published online. We found several examples that supported this idea.

We went through the magazine to find the most blog worthy and reoccurring features. We made sure that these articles were easy to link to, and easy to find each week.

WordPress was used to make a very non-blog looking site that focused on the main story of each printed issue. The editorial staff adds a few extra features to the main story every week; sound clips from an interview, more pictures or a movie for instance.

To enhance the weekly magazine feel, we made a parallel navigation structure that made it easy to find specific articles in each issue. This, along with some WordPress plugin goodies such as Lightbox and a few others made the site simple, easy to use and SEO-friendly. So far so good.

2. Making it interesting. The next step was the launch of the wiki that I mentioned earlier. Fokus expressed a wish to engage political bloggers in some way – an idea that we fully supported. Our suggestion was a wiki with politically and socially interesting people. This, with some sort of tracking functionality, would create reference points around which discussions in the blogosphere could circle. It also creates a natural meeting ground between the people writing the blogs, and the people being written about.

We figured that the only thing we could guarantee that everyone in the wiki would be interested in was – well – themsselves. Everyone has ego-googled one time or another. This is a way of simplifying ego-searching in the Swedish blogosphere, if you will. As a launch, and an editorial start to the wiki, it was decided that Fokus should rank the 100 most powerful people in Sweden.

We could not use Swedish Wikipedia as they wouldn’t have allowed anyone to add themselves the way Fokus have intended. Also, the tracking would have been difficult to implement. The financial aspect of being able to sell advertising was of course a part of this decision as well. We looked at developing our own ping-service but took the decision that a modification of Twingly´s widget was the best way to go. Primelabs were very helpful and positive in developing this. As far as we know, the combination of these two services is unique – but please correct me if I’m wrong here.

3. Results. It’s far too early to tell what the results are going to be, but the initial response we got from bloggers and MSM has been overwhelmingly positive so far. I took some screenshots from the night of the launch that you can look at here if you like:

Dagens Nyheter
fokus-dn.png

E24
fokus-e24.png

Expressen
fokus-expressen.png

Internetworld
fokus-iw.png

Svenska Dagbladet
fokus-svd.png

SVT
fokus-svt.png

Bear in mind that the projects were adjusted to fit both the budget, and the amount of hours that could be used for updating the site each week. A lot of things could have been done differently, if the conditions were different. This is always the case, but I thought that it deserved being pointed out specifically to avoid a discussion about the wrong things.

At Media Evolution today

Good Old Trend

I’m in the audience of Media Evolution at the moment, and I’ll be holding a short keynote later on. If you’re here – please come up and say hello to me or my colleagues. This is what we look like. There’s a video of me here as well – and if you’re wondering: yes, the last part was intended as a joke. It didn’t really seem to get through well enough 😉

The same things goes for tomorrow, when I’m in Hellerup for New Media Days.

Don’t be shy!

OMG! Google acquires Jaiku

Good Old Trend

Google acquires Jaiku

Jaiku is joining Google. While it’s too soon to comment on specific plans, we look forward to working with our new friends at Google over the coming months to expand in ways we hope you’ll find interesting and useful. Our engineers are excited to be working together and enthusiastic developers lead to great innovation. We look forward to accomplishing great things together. In order to focus on innovation instead of scaling, we have decided to close new user sign-ups for now.

But fear not, all our Jaiku services will stay running the way you are used to and you will be able to invite your friends to Jaiku. We have put together a quick Q&A about the acquisition.

Jyri Engeström and Petteri Koponen, Jaiku Founders

(source)

Jaiku, one of my favourite internet services, was just acquired by Google. Congratulations to Jyri and the rest of the team! And the mist clears slightly on the Gphone front. It´s very interesting news, but too early for me to have an analysis worth while. Let’s just let this one sink in for a bit.

tags technorati :

tags bloggar.se: , ,

Most transparent CEO – part 1

Good Old Trend

As I’ve been challenged by both Jocke and Sorosh regarding the title as most transparent CEO, I have to step my game up a bit.

Apart from Jaiku and Dopplr, I’m planning to release my calendar (iCal) and my todos (Remember the Milk). Unfortunately the iCal-feed seems to contain everything I’ve ever written it in – and not just the upcoming events (is there a way of fixing this?). This means that I have to go through all my events in order to make sure that nothing sensitive is published. I can be transparent, but I can’t assume that all my clients want to be. I’m working on that one.

On all future events this could be arranged fairly simply, but on the other hand – what is the point of saying that I have a meeting with a someone if I only name their company name, or the persons first name? That would be like phoning somebody’s secretary and finding out he/she was “in a meeting”. Not very transparent. On the other hand I can’t force it upon people either.

It’s interesting, but a bit tricky all this. Any thoughts on what approach to take here?

tags technorati :

tags bloggar.se:

Why Web TV is more than just bad normal TV

Good Old Trend

I’m a guest lecturer at the University of Lund this week. The theme is online journalism, a subject that interests me a lot. Apart from the irony of me lecturing at the same institution that I once planned to attend, a lot of interesting thoughts have come up regarding journalism. Web TV for instance. I had to write it down.

It seems some have misunderstood the whole point of TV, or moving images, on the web. It’s not the fact that it can be done, and it´s not that people have suddenly opened their eyes to it. It’s that TV on the web can do things that regular TV can’t.

So why is so much of Web TV just a cheap, badly edited excuse for not owning a real TV channel? Because the people doing it are old media. And they tend to look at other old media to try to understand what’s going on. Bad idea, considering that most old media sucks.

Here’s five aspects I thought of that makes Web TV superior, and that should be used more often:

1. It’s on demand. Nuff said.

2. It’s endless. Regular TV lacks the space, and therefor the versatility, of publishing alternate takes, edits, or angles.

3. It’s interactive. Reader commentary – text, chat or video response – adds a new dimension to the conversation.

4. It’s fast. Update as often as possible.

5. It’s there. You need a semi-modern mobile phone – that’s it. The possibility to catch moving images has never been better. You can, and should be, unique.

tags technorati :

tags bloggar.se: , ,

Facebook launches FBFund

Good Old Trend

Now this is normally not a blog that covers too much news, but this was to interesting to pass on. At Techcrunch 40, Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, announced that they will be starting a fund to support Facebook developers. The sum of money will range from $25 000-$250 000 and the only condition so far is that it is spent on developing their company within Facebook.

IMHO, this is a brilliant idea. When I held my presentation at Stanford I spoke of eight types of internet currency. Money was the last one, and Revver´s rev-sharing was my example then. Paying for content or action is somehow the final incentive as it is the most common form of it outside the internet (salary).

Setting up a fund that supports developers is just a nicer and more interesting way of doing that. Also, the buzz around each payout could become the same as major VCs investing in startups. This is a truly intelligent initiative.

tags technorati :

tags bloggar.se: , , , , ,

And it only took 70 years

Good Old Trend

kanal5.jpg

70 years with television and suddenly the TV channels gets how people watch it. Using several channels, not just the one that they happen to own.

It started this summer with Schibsted´s acquisition of TV.nu, a fairly basic site that lists what television programmes are on. Following this, both TV4 and Kanal5 decided to take on a new approach to what a television site could, and should, contain. Information about television – no matter what channel or torrent tracker it may be on.

Check the screen shot above – Kanal5s top story is about the rivalling channel SVT. TV4´s TVplaneten lists SVT1, SVT2 and TV3 before their own channels. Just like they should.

People that are interested in TV are interested in good programmes. Where these programmes are shown is secondary. Imagine that it only took 70 years to work that one out.

tags technorati :

tags bloggar.se: , , , , , ,